Factors Affecting Nursing Student Satisfaction in Online Learning During the COVID 19 Pandemic

Rohayati Rohayati; Anung Ahadi Pradana; Noerfitri Noerfitri

doi:10.24990/injec.v7i2.517

Factors Affecting Nursing Student Satisfaction in Online Learning During the COVID 19 Pandemic

Rohayati Rohayati, Anung Ahadi Pradana, Noerfitri Noerfitri

= http://dx.doi.org/10.24990/injec.v7i2.517

Abstract views = 40 times |

views = 23 times

Abstract

Introduction: The Covid-19 pandemic had an impact on nursing education in Indonesia. Most nursing education providers have not implemented online learning before the Covid-19 pandemic. All components of the campus must adapt quickly so that learning outcomes can be obtained as planned. This study aims to find out the factors that influence the satisfaction of nursing students in online learning.

Method: This study uses a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design. The population is 350 undergraduate nursing students in private nursing education. The response rate was 203 people (58%). Ethical clearance was conducted by the Etic Committee of Bani Saleh School Health Science with the number EC.181 / KEPK / STKBS / VIII / 2022. Data collection is carried out from August to September 2022. Data analysis using SPSS 24 using spearman rank. Results: The results showed that most respondents were female, with a median age of 22.78 years, and most were in regular programs. Most of the students had online learning experiences before the pandemic. The median hours of online study are 7.66 hours. The results of the bivariate analysis show that the variables that have a relationship with positive direction and moderate correlation with student satisfaction are student readiness (p-value 0.00; r 0.55); learning design (p-value 0.000; r 0.44), technology support (p-value 0.00; r 0.48); lecturer interaction (p-value 0.000; r 0.40). Variables that are related but have a positive direction with a weak correlation include the learning platform (p-value 0.000; r 0.30), social presence (p-value 0.000; r 0.26); direct instruction (p-value 0.000; r 0.26); student interaction (p-value 0.000; r 0.26) and learning content (p-value 0.000; r 0.30).

Conclusions: All factors are related to student satisfaction in online learning. Factors that have a moderate correlation are student readiness, learner design, technology support, and lecturer interaction. Educational institutions must be proactive in reviewing online learning policies and conducting studies before implementing online learning methods.

Keywords

online learning, online education, nursing education, satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-emran, M., Elsherif, H. M. and Shaalan, K. (2016) ‘Computers in Human Behavior Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education’, Computers in Human Behavior. Elsevier Ltd, 56, pp. 93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.033.

Ali, W. G. M. (2012) ‘Factors Affecting Nursing Student’s Satisfaction with E- Learning Experience in King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia’, International Journal of Learning and Development, 2(2). doi: 10.5296/ijld.v2i2.1666.

Arbaugh, J. Ben (2014) ‘System, scholar or students? Which most influences online MBA course effectiveness?’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Wiley Online Library, 30(4), pp. 349–362.

Arkorful, V. and Abaidoo, N. (2015) ‘The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education’, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), pp. 29–42.

Barbera, E., Clara, M. and Linder-Vanberschot, J. A. (2013) ‘Factors influencing student satisfaction and perceived learning in online courses’, E-learning and Digital Media. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, 10(3), pp. 226–235.

Basuony, M. A. K. et al. (2020) ‘The factors affecting student satisfaction with online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: an empirical study of an emerging Muslim country’, Journal of Islamic Marketing. Emerald Publishing Limited.

Bossman, A. and Agyei, S. K. (2022) ‘Technology and instructor dimensions, e-learning satisfaction, and academic performance of distance students in Ghana’, Heliyon, 8(4), p. e09200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09200.

CarinaDolch (2020) ‘Toys fot The Boys, Tools for the Girls? Gender and Media usage Patterns in Higher Education’, Journal, 21(3), pp. 94–111.

Cheng, G. and Chau, J. (2016) ‘Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course’, British journal of educational technology. Wiley Online Library, 47(2), pp. 257–278.

Chiero, R. et al. (2015) ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning in teacher preparation’, Educational Media International. Taylor & Francis, 52(3), pp. 188–200.

Chigeza, P. and Halbert, K. (2014) ‘Navigating E-learning and blended learning for pre-service teachers: Redesigning for engagement, access and efficiency’, Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 39(11), pp. 133–146.

Cho, M.-H. and Tobias, S. (2016) ‘Should instructors require discussion in online courses? Effects of online discussion on community of inquiry, learner time, satisfaction, and achievement’, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Athabasca University Press (AU Press), 17(2), pp. 123–140.

Coman, C. et al. (2020) ‘Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective’, Sustainability, 12(24). doi: 10.3390/su122410367.

Conole, G. (2012) Designing for learning in an open world. Springer Science & Business Media.

Croxton, R. A. (2014) ‘The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning’, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching (MERLOT), 10(2), p. 314.

Dahlstrom, E., Christopher Brooks, D. and Bichsel, J. (2014) The Current Ecosystem of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: Student, Faculty, and IT Perspectives. Louisville.

Fedynich, L., Bradley, K. S. and Bradley, J. (2015) ‘Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning.’, Research in Higher Education Journal. ERIC, 27.

Fitzgerald, A. and Konrad, S. (2021) ‘Transition in learning during COVID‐19: Student nurse anxiety, stress, and resource support’, in Nursing Forum. Wiley Online Library, pp. 298–304.

Furnes, M., Kvaal, K. S. and Høye, S. (2018) ‘Communication in mental health nursing - Bachelor Students’ appraisal of a blended learning training programme - An exploratory study’, BMC Nursing. BMC Nursing, 17(1), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12912-018-0288-9.

Gazi, Z. K. (2013) ‘on New Trends in Education and Their Implications ( IJONTE )’, International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE), 4(4), p. 214. doi: 10.1039/c1sm05960b.

Gray, J. A. and DiLoreto, M. (2016) ‘The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments.’, International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation. ERIC, 11(1), p. n1.

Heinerichs, S., Pazzaglia, G. and Gilboy, M. B. (2016) ‘Using flipped classroom components in blended courses to maximize student learning’, Athletic training education journal. National Athletic Trainers Association, 11(1), pp. 54–57.

Horzum, M. B. (2017) ‘Interaction, structure, social presence, and satisfaction in online learning’, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Modestum Publishing LTD, 11(3), pp. 505–512.

Kuo, Y.-C. et al. (2014) ‘Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses’, The internet and higher education. Elsevier, 20, pp. 35–50.

Lee, J. (2014) ‘An exploratory study of effective online learning: Assessing satisfaction levels of graduate students of mathematics education associated with human and design factors of an online course’, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Athabasca University Press (AU Press), 15(1), pp. 111–132.

Legewie, J. and DiPrete, T. A. (2012) ‘School context and the gender gap in educational achievement’, American Sociological Review. Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 77(3), pp. 463–485.

Li, N., Marsh, V. and Rienties, B. (2016) ‘Modelling and Managing Learner Satisfaction : Use of Learner Feedback to Enhance Blended and Online Learning Experience’, 14(2).

Maqableh, M. and Alia, M. (2021) ‘Evaluation online learning of undergraduate students under lockdown amidst COVID-19 Pandemic: The online learning experience and students’ satisfaction’, Children and Youth Services Review, 128, p. 106160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106160.

Mary, S., Julie, J. and Jennifer, G. (2014) ‘Teaching evidence based practice and research through blended learning to undergraduate midwifery students from a practice based perspective’, Nurse Education in practice. Elsevier, 14(2), pp. 220–224.

Muflih, S. et al. (2020) ‘Online Education for Undergraduate Health Professional Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Attitudes, Barriers, and Ethical Issues’.

Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K. and Balle, S. H. (2018) ‘A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement’, Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(1), pp. 45–55.

Pollit, D.F; Beck, C. . (2012) Resource Manual for Nursing Research. Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. USA: Lippincot.

Qureshi, I. A. et al. (2012) ‘Challenges of implementing e-learning in a Pakistani university’, Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 4(3), pp. 310–324. doi: 10.34105/j.kmel.2012.04.025.

Richardson, J. C. et al. (2017) ‘Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis’, Computers in Human Behavior. Elsevier Ltd, 71, pp. 402–417. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001.

Rienties, B. and Toetenel, L. (2016) ‘The impact of 151 learning designs on student satisfaction and performance: social learning (analytics) matters’, in Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge, pp. 339–343.

Sharples, M. et al. (2014) Innovating pedagogy 2014: exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers. The Open University,.

Sianturi, S. R. (2018) ‘Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Melalui Evaluasi E-Learning Pada Institusi Keperawatan Di Jakarta Dan Depok’, Jurnal Pendidikan Keperawatan Indonesia, 4(2). doi: 10.17509/jpki.v4i2.11563.

Southard, S., Meddaugh, J. and France-Harris, A. (2015) ‘Can SPOC (self-paced online course) live long and prosper? A comparison study of a new species of online course delivery’, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 18(2).

Staddon, R. V (2020) ‘Bringing technology to the mature classroom : age differences in use and attitudes’. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

Tobarra, L. et al. (2014) ‘Analyzing the students’ behavior and relevant topics in virtual learning communities’, Computers in Human Behavior. Elsevier, 31, pp. 659–669.

Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M. and Ross, M. E. (2013) ‘Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning’, Distance Education. Routledge, 34(3), pp. 302–323. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.835779.

Wasim, J. et al. (2014) ‘Web-based learning innovations’, Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol, 5(1), pp. 5859–64.

Wu, M.-J., Zhao, K. and Fils-Aime, F. (2022) ‘Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis’, Computers in Human Behavior Reports. Elsevier, p. 100206.

Yilmaz, R. (2017) ‘Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom’, Computers in Human Behavior. Elsevier Ltd, 70, pp. 251–260. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085.